An Article by Juris Ferrum’s Managing Partner on Protecting Athletes’ Rights in Anti-Doping Disputes Published in the UNBA Bulletin

An Article by Juris Ferrum’s Managing Partner on Protecting Athletes’ Rights in Anti-Doping Disputes Published in the UNBA Bulletin

This year has undoubtedly been marked by anti-doping work for our team: webinars, speaking engagements, roundtable discussions, expert comments — and now a publication in the official journal of the Ukrainian National Bar Association. Only recently did we realise that, despite years of practice in this area, we had never written for this Bulletin specifically on doping matters. Time to fix that 😊

У Віснику НААУ вийшла стаття керуючої партнерки АО «Юріс Феррум» про захист прав спортсменів у антидопінгових спорах

The July–August issue of the Bulletin of the Ukrainian National Bar Association features an article by Juris Ferrum’s Managing Partner Gnizdovska Ganna, titled:
“Certain Specifics of Protecting the Rights of Professional Athletes in Disputes Concerning Violations of Anti-Doping Rules.”

Anti-doping disputes always involve a delicate balance between law, medicine, evidence, and human factors. Intuition or “common sense” simply do not work here — only strict standards, international protocols, and formalised procedures. That is why a lawyer handling such a case must be well-versed in sports law, procedural safeguards, toxicology, laboratory practices, and WADA documentation.

A brief overview of what the article covers:

🔹 What doping means in the legal sense
It covers far more than a prohibited substance — including evading testing, tampering with procedures, assisting violations, and failing to provide whereabouts information, in accordance with the WADA Code.

🔹 How the anti-doping system operates in Ukraine
The article explains the roles of the National Anti-Doping Center (NADC), the Disciplinary and Appeal anti-doping Commissions, the Therapeutic Use Exemption Committee, as well as the significance of CAS as the primary international tribunal shaping global jurisprudence.

🔹 The principle of Strict Liability
An athlete is responsible for the presence of a prohibited substance regardless of intent — a principle consistently upheld in CAS jurisprudence.

🔹 Procedural safeguards for athletes
The article outlines the allocation of the burden of proof between the anti-doping organization and the athlete, and the applicable standards of proof in anti-doping cases.

🔹 A practical algorithm for defence
Checking ISTI/ISL compliance, analysing the laboratory documentation package, assessing TUE issues, identifying the source of the substance, consulting medical experts, forming a position on fault or negligence, and deciding whether to request the opening of the B sample.

Juris Ferrum congratulates Ganna on the publication and is proud of our team’s continued contribution to the development of sports law in Ukraine 💙⚖️